12/25/2023 Ow many cities in the United States have joined the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & EnergyRead Now![]() Local efforts can get a community part way to ambitious goals, at least on paper, but wider policy and market forces are needed to reach 80 x 50-scale goals. What are some examples of communities at this level that have successfully “bent the curve” on GHG emissions? How are these communities doing it? And how are they responding to hard questions about scope of authority, evaluation methods, partnerships, and risk assessment? We chatted with ICF energy efficiency expert Bill Prindle to find out.Ĭompared to state and national policies and programs, the idea of making big strides against climate change can be intimidating for local governments. Yet some are making progress by breaking down their aspirational, long-term goals into shorter-term, more achievable targets. In addition to common bureaucratic headaches like funding and stakeholder resistance, others need to contend with policy limitations - meaning that even if they can identify the source of GHGs in their area, they may not have the authority to mitigate those emissions. And we’re not talking about a handful of examples here: some 164 American communities have joined the Global Covenant of Mayors on Climate and Energy and 392 mayors have joined Climate Mayors to commit to the Paris Accord goals.ĭespite good intentions, these communities face hard realities in pursuit of such lofty goals. Others have formed or joined local government networks in pursuit of a collective approach to climate change mitigation. Some have agreed to adhere to the tenets of the Paris Climate Accords. ![]() Some have committed to aggressive action plans, like cutting emissions by 80 percent by 2050 (“80 x 50” reductions). Across the U.S., local governments are taking big steps to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |